|
Post by saiful200 on Aug 21, 2024 1:13:12 GMT -5
For this reason, I believe that we must differentiate between companies that have purely social objectives, that is, their only purpose is to help the development of society and collaborate in some way to achieve a better world, and those companies that seek to differentiate themselves from their competitors through social actions and measures to care for the planet. This does not mean that, from my point of view, companies that seek to benefit from their social works are criticizable in any way, I consider that all good actions must be valued as such even if the motive that moves them is in some way selfish. Login to respond Joan Faig A very good article that undoubtedly gives food for thought. Without a doubt, we are facing a new model of companies that, without a doubt, have realized the power of the consumer. A few years ago, being https://www.latestdatabase.com/ a social business consisted of a few donations and/or Corporate Social Responsibility actions. I'm not saying that they weren't useful to society, but it seemed that what the companies wanted was to cover the file and move on to something else. These current, more creative forms, although they also pursue the objective of notoriety and business profitability (few companies do something for nothing, unless we are talking about NGOs), undoubtedly imply much more commitment on their part and much more time. It's not about making a donation and that's it. Maintaining a database by Savana involves resources and people on an ongoing basis.
|
|